<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This Just In: AJAX Is Important</title>
	<atom:link href="http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2005/06/this-just-in-ajax-is-important/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2005/06/this-just-in-ajax-is-important/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 10:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Finkle</title>
		<link>http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2005/06/this-just-in-ajax-is-important/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Finkle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2005 22:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/?p=36#comment-36</guid>
		<description>I am glad Microsoft is embracing AJAX and the browser (again). I am just remembering that they stopped innovating web technologies before when browser apps started to rival desktop apps. I am not ready to dive into the Koolaid yet.

Also, I take issue with the notion that writing DHTML/Javascript is messy. The way I see it, if you write messy Javascript, you write messy code period. And as to dealing with cross browser scripting problems, how is this different from cross platform desktop problems? Developers can deal with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am glad Microsoft is embracing AJAX and the browser (again). I am just remembering that they stopped innovating web technologies before when browser apps started to rival desktop apps. I am not ready to dive into the Koolaid yet.</p>
<p>Also, I take issue with the notion that writing DHTML/Javascript is messy. The way I see it, if you write messy Javascript, you write messy code period. And as to dealing with cross browser scripting problems, how is this different from cross platform desktop problems? Developers can deal with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2005/06/this-just-in-ajax-is-important/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2005 00:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/?p=36#comment-35</guid>
		<description>I think they're doing it because they &lt;I&gt;can&lt;/I&gt;, and because there clearly is a need for it. Writing "code" in Java Script really is a hell of a mess, and if Ajax based technology is going to be lifted to the next level, there's a need for a mid-layer that shields the developers from having to deal with the sheer messiness of Java Script + HTML. 

Elling</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they&#8217;re doing it because they <i>can</i>, and because there clearly is a need for it. Writing &#8220;code&#8221; in Java Script really is a hell of a mess, and if Ajax based technology is going to be lifted to the next level, there&#8217;s a need for a mid-layer that shields the developers from having to deal with the sheer messiness of Java Script + HTML. </p>
<p>Elling</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2005/06/this-just-in-ajax-is-important/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2005 20:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/?p=36#comment-34</guid>
		<description>"Microsoft is late and needs to make some mindshare."

Seems like this is all they've been doing in the last year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Microsoft is late and needs to make some mindshare.&#8221;</p>
<p>Seems like this is all they&#8217;ve been doing in the last year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
