<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AJAX and Rocket Science</title>
	<atom:link href="http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2005/07/ajax-and-rocket-science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2005/07/ajax-and-rocket-science/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 06:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2005/07/ajax-and-rocket-science/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2005 11:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/?p=38#comment-39</guid>
		<description>I agree that experienced programmers will be able to create "tidy" code regardless of the system or language they're working in. I think that's the point you're trying to make. 

But saying this is not the same as saying it's equally EASY to create tidy code across different systems or languages. 

For instance, if you compare C and C++, the reason that most people would choose C++ over C is that C++ makes it EASIER to describe certain types of higher level structures. And using C++ you &lt;I&gt;usually&lt;/I&gt; end up with more compact and more comprehensible programs than if you were using C for solving the same problem.

I'm not saying that it's impossible to create a clean and tidy solution in C for a complex problem. That's certainly possible. But it's EASIER to do it in C++, mainly because you have the &lt;I&gt;class&lt;/I&gt; construct.

So, I'll have to disagree with you: Choice of language isn't irrelevant, even if you're an experienced programmer.

Elling</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that experienced programmers will be able to create &#8220;tidy&#8221; code regardless of the system or language they&#8217;re working in. I think that&#8217;s the point you&#8217;re trying to make. </p>
<p>But saying this is not the same as saying it&#8217;s equally EASY to create tidy code across different systems or languages. </p>
<p>For instance, if you compare C and C++, the reason that most people would choose C++ over C is that C++ makes it EASIER to describe certain types of higher level structures. And using C++ you <i>usually</i> end up with more compact and more comprehensible programs than if you were using C for solving the same problem.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying that it&#8217;s impossible to create a clean and tidy solution in C for a complex problem. That&#8217;s certainly possible. But it&#8217;s EASIER to do it in C++, mainly because you have the <i>class</i> construct.</p>
<p>So, I&#8217;ll have to disagree with you: Choice of language isn&#8217;t irrelevant, even if you&#8217;re an experienced programmer.</p>
<p>Elling</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Finkle</title>
		<link>http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2005/07/ajax-and-rocket-science/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Finkle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2005 20:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/?p=38#comment-38</guid>
		<description>Elling,

Your one of my only readers, so I don't like telling you that your wrong. But, in this case I need to tell you that your wrong.

C++ and Delphi (I use these everyday) are very easy to mess up when writing complicated programs. I would guess that same for C# and Java (I use them rarely, if ever). I believe its the complexity of the program and experience level of the programmer that determines how messed up the code becomes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elling,</p>
<p>Your one of my only readers, so I don&#8217;t like telling you that your wrong. But, in this case I need to tell you that your wrong.</p>
<p>C++ and Delphi (I use these everyday) are very easy to mess up when writing complicated programs. I would guess that same for C# and Java (I use them rarely, if ever). I believe its the complexity of the program and experience level of the programmer that determines how messed up the code becomes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2005/07/ajax-and-rocket-science/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2005 22:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/?p=38#comment-37</guid>
		<description>You can mess things up in any language. No doubt. But I think it's EASIER to mess things up in some languages. 

Here's a couple of easily messed up languages, in my opinion: 

  Any non-object oriented language
  Scheme
  Lisp
  Java Script
  Perl, to a certain extent
  Visual Basic, to a certain extent

Harder to mess up languages:
  C++
  Delphi
  C#
  Java

Sure, you can write "neat" programs in all of the mentioned languages. But I think, once you start dealing with large and complex structures, you're LESS likely to mess things up if you use one of the more structured languages suggested. 

:)

Elling</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can mess things up in any language. No doubt. But I think it&#8217;s EASIER to mess things up in some languages. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a couple of easily messed up languages, in my opinion: </p>
<p>  Any non-object oriented language<br />
  Scheme<br />
  Lisp<br />
  Java Script<br />
  Perl, to a certain extent<br />
  Visual Basic, to a certain extent</p>
<p>Harder to mess up languages:<br />
  C++<br />
  Delphi<br />
  C#<br />
  Java</p>
<p>Sure, you can write &#8220;neat&#8221; programs in all of the mentioned languages. But I think, once you start dealing with large and complex structures, you&#8217;re LESS likely to mess things up if you use one of the more structured languages suggested.<br />
 <img src='http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Elling</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
