<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AJAX and Rocket Science</title>
	<atom:link href="http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2005/07/ajax-and-rocket-science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2005/07/ajax-and-rocket-science/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 07:09:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2005/07/ajax-and-rocket-science/comment-page-1/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2005 11:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/?p=38#comment-39</guid>
		<description>I agree that experienced programmers will be able to create &quot;tidy&quot; code regardless of the system or language they&#039;re working in. I think that&#039;s the point you&#039;re trying to make. 

But saying this is not the same as saying it&#039;s equally EASY to create tidy code across different systems or languages. 

For instance, if you compare C and C++, the reason that most people would choose C++ over C is that C++ makes it EASIER to describe certain types of higher level structures. And using C++ you &lt;I&gt;usually&lt;/I&gt; end up with more compact and more comprehensible programs than if you were using C for solving the same problem.

I&#039;m not saying that it&#039;s impossible to create a clean and tidy solution in C for a complex problem. That&#039;s certainly possible. But it&#039;s EASIER to do it in C++, mainly because you have the &lt;I&gt;class&lt;/I&gt; construct.

So, I&#039;ll have to disagree with you: Choice of language isn&#039;t irrelevant, even if you&#039;re an experienced programmer.

Elling</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that experienced programmers will be able to create &#8220;tidy&#8221; code regardless of the system or language they&#8217;re working in. I think that&#8217;s the point you&#8217;re trying to make. </p>
<p>But saying this is not the same as saying it&#8217;s equally EASY to create tidy code across different systems or languages. </p>
<p>For instance, if you compare C and C++, the reason that most people would choose C++ over C is that C++ makes it EASIER to describe certain types of higher level structures. And using C++ you <i>usually</i> end up with more compact and more comprehensible programs than if you were using C for solving the same problem.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying that it&#8217;s impossible to create a clean and tidy solution in C for a complex problem. That&#8217;s certainly possible. But it&#8217;s EASIER to do it in C++, mainly because you have the <i>class</i> construct.</p>
<p>So, I&#8217;ll have to disagree with you: Choice of language isn&#8217;t irrelevant, even if you&#8217;re an experienced programmer.</p>
<p>Elling</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Finkle</title>
		<link>http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2005/07/ajax-and-rocket-science/comment-page-1/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Finkle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2005 20:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/?p=38#comment-38</guid>
		<description>Elling,

Your one of my only readers, so I don&#039;t like telling you that your wrong. But, in this case I need to tell you that your wrong.

C++ and Delphi (I use these everyday) are very easy to mess up when writing complicated programs. I would guess that same for C# and Java (I use them rarely, if ever). I believe its the complexity of the program and experience level of the programmer that determines how messed up the code becomes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elling,</p>
<p>Your one of my only readers, so I don&#8217;t like telling you that your wrong. But, in this case I need to tell you that your wrong.</p>
<p>C++ and Delphi (I use these everyday) are very easy to mess up when writing complicated programs. I would guess that same for C# and Java (I use them rarely, if ever). I believe its the complexity of the program and experience level of the programmer that determines how messed up the code becomes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2005/07/ajax-and-rocket-science/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2005 22:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/?p=38#comment-37</guid>
		<description>You can mess things up in any language. No doubt. But I think it&#039;s EASIER to mess things up in some languages. 

Here&#039;s a couple of easily messed up languages, in my opinion: 

  Any non-object oriented language
  Scheme
  Lisp
  Java Script
  Perl, to a certain extent
  Visual Basic, to a certain extent

Harder to mess up languages:
  C++
  Delphi
  C#
  Java

Sure, you can write &quot;neat&quot; programs in all of the mentioned languages. But I think, once you start dealing with large and complex structures, you&#039;re LESS likely to mess things up if you use one of the more structured languages suggested. 

:)

Elling</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can mess things up in any language. No doubt. But I think it&#8217;s EASIER to mess things up in some languages. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a couple of easily messed up languages, in my opinion: </p>
<p>  Any non-object oriented language<br />
  Scheme<br />
  Lisp<br />
  Java Script<br />
  Perl, to a certain extent<br />
  Visual Basic, to a certain extent</p>
<p>Harder to mess up languages:<br />
  C++<br />
  Delphi<br />
  C#<br />
  Java</p>
<p>Sure, you can write &#8220;neat&#8221; programs in all of the mentioned languages. But I think, once you start dealing with large and complex structures, you&#8217;re LESS likely to mess things up if you use one of the more structured languages suggested.<br />
 <img src='http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Elling</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

