<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Site Specific Browers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2006/11/site-specific-browers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2006/11/site-specific-browers/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 10:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Finkle</title>
		<link>http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2006/11/site-specific-browers/#comment-199</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Finkle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 19:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2006/11/site-specific-browers/#comment-199</guid>
		<description>Matt - I agree with your reasoning for SSB suitability.  In addition to GMail (or perhaps even better) is Google Docs and Spreadsheets. I think desktop integration there would be more valuable. There could be so many more "power user" tasks that an SSB could simplify.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt - I agree with your reasoning for SSB suitability.  In addition to GMail (or perhaps even better) is Google Docs and Spreadsheets. I think desktop integration there would be more valuable. There could be so many more &#8220;power user&#8221; tasks that an SSB could simplify.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Brindley</title>
		<link>http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2006/11/site-specific-browers/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Brindley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 17:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2006/11/site-specific-browers/#comment-198</guid>
		<description>Hey,

I built the Windows version of Pyro, Flare. I agree Mark, I think there's a whole bunch of web apps that could easily extend some functionality onto the desktop.
I've found that web apps that increase their power users' productivity by extending it to the desktop are far more effective than simply bringing parts of the web app to the desktop.

An obvious example would be GMail. If you use your email throughout the day (making you, in this example, a power user) a web application can quickly become unsuitable - however if you only check once per day or even less, an SSB becomes just another step to get your email.

This is why I believe applications such as IDEs are not appropriate for a web application. What IDE user is not a power user?

- Matt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey,</p>
<p>I built the Windows version of Pyro, Flare. I agree Mark, I think there&#8217;s a whole bunch of web apps that could easily extend some functionality onto the desktop.<br />
I&#8217;ve found that web apps that increase their power users&#8217; productivity by extending it to the desktop are far more effective than simply bringing parts of the web app to the desktop.</p>
<p>An obvious example would be GMail. If you use your email throughout the day (making you, in this example, a power user) a web application can quickly become unsuitable - however if you only check once per day or even less, an SSB becomes just another step to get your email.</p>
<p>This is why I believe applications such as IDEs are not appropriate for a web application. What IDE user is not a power user?</p>
<p>- Matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Finkle</title>
		<link>http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2006/11/site-specific-browers/#comment-188</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Finkle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 21:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2006/11/site-specific-browers/#comment-188</guid>
		<description>Rafael,

I don't know that I agree with you about "only a handful ... make sense". That is like saying, since iTunes exists, we don't need any other site specific media applications. I don't believe that's the case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rafael,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know that I agree with you about &#8220;only a handful &#8230; make sense&#8221;. That is like saying, since iTunes exists, we don&#8217;t need any other site specific media applications. I don&#8217;t believe that&#8217;s the case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafael</title>
		<link>http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2006/11/site-specific-browers/#comment-183</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 07:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2006/11/site-specific-browers/#comment-183</guid>
		<description>There's actually a bunch of these, and more on the way.  The biggest example is iTunes which is essentially a site specific browser for iTunes store.  

It's not necessarily the next big thing because only a handful of site specific or vertical clients make sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s actually a bunch of these, and more on the way.  The biggest example is iTunes which is essentially a site specific browser for iTunes store.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s not necessarily the next big thing because only a handful of site specific or vertical clients make sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elmo</title>
		<link>http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2006/11/site-specific-browers/#comment-179</link>
		<dc:creator>Elmo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 18:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2006/11/site-specific-browers/#comment-179</guid>
		<description>Many years ago, when the world was a much hotter place ("Summer In the City" may not have been written about Houston but the shoe fits) Elmo asked a site admin why his site only supported Internet Exploder and the response included the phrase "you open source loser".  That tickles Elmo now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many years ago, when the world was a much hotter place (&#8221;Summer In the City&#8221; may not have been written about Houston but the shoe fits) Elmo asked a site admin why his site only supported Internet Exploder and the response included the phrase &#8220;you open source loser&#8221;.  That tickles Elmo now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
