<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thinking About a XUL Validator</title>
	<atom:link href="http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2007/01/thinking-about-a-xul-validator/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2007/01/thinking-about-a-xul-validator/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 21:18:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ptaszor i jego blog! Lol...</title>
		<link>http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2007/01/thinking-about-a-xul-validator/comment-page-1/#comment-743</link>
		<dc:creator>Ptaszor i jego blog! Lol...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 15:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2007/01/thinking-about-a-xul-validator/#comment-743</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Walidator XUL...&lt;/strong&gt;

Mark Finkle na swoim blogu opublikowaÅ‚ wersjÄ™ beta prostego walidatora XUL. 

ChcÄ…c go uÅ¼yÄ‡ wystarczy kod jÄ™zyka XUL wkleiÄ‡ w pole formularza i sprawdziÄ‡ jego poprawnoÅ›Ä‡.



Aktualnie walidator sprawdza poprawnoÅ›Ä‡ i semantycznoÅ›Ä‡ kodu XUL...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Walidator XUL&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Mark Finkle na swoim blogu opublikowaÅ‚ wersjÄ™ beta prostego walidatora XUL. </p>
<p>ChcÄ…c go uÅ¼yÄ‡ wystarczy kod jÄ™zyka XUL wkleiÄ‡ w pole formularza i sprawdziÄ‡ jego poprawnoÅ›Ä‡.</p>
<p>Aktualnie walidator sprawdza poprawnoÅ›Ä‡ i semantycznoÅ›Ä‡ kodu XUL&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Finkle&#8217;s Weblog &#187; XUL Validator - Beta</title>
		<link>http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2007/01/thinking-about-a-xul-validator/comment-page-1/#comment-580</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Finkle&#8217;s Weblog &#187; XUL Validator - Beta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 17:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2007/01/thinking-about-a-xul-validator/#comment-580</guid>
		<description>[...] I put together a simple XUL validator based on the ideas in my last post. There is a primitive front end where you can put XUL into a textarea and validate it. The validator is completely client-side JavaScript with a simple JSON rules file. You can view the source and the rules from the validator &#8220;Tests&#8221; page. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I put together a simple XUL validator based on the ideas in my last post. There is a primitive front end where you can put XUL into a textarea and validate it. The validator is completely client-side JavaScript with a simple JSON rules file. You can view the source and the rules from the validator &#8220;Tests&#8221; page. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stelt</title>
		<link>http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2007/01/thinking-about-a-xul-validator/comment-page-1/#comment-482</link>
		<dc:creator>stelt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 21:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2007/01/thinking-about-a-xul-validator/#comment-482</guid>
		<description>Maybe it&#039;s useful to look into the new modular validator framework of the W3C.
I once started a &#039;beyond validation&#039; SVG checker, but still have to improve that into a generally usable state.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it&#8217;s useful to look into the new modular validator framework of the W3C.<br />
I once started a &#8216;beyond validation&#8217; SVG checker, but still have to improve that into a generally usable state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pd</title>
		<link>http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2007/01/thinking-about-a-xul-validator/comment-page-1/#comment-431</link>
		<dc:creator>pd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 03:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2007/01/thinking-about-a-xul-validator/#comment-431</guid>
		<description>great idea, go for it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great idea, go for it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Vincent</title>
		<link>http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2007/01/thinking-about-a-xul-validator/comment-page-1/#comment-429</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Vincent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 00:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2007/01/thinking-about-a-xul-validator/#comment-429</guid>
		<description>Mark, let&#039;s talk in some detail.  I have an interface in my Verbosio application for validating XML documents in a given language such as XUL.  Soon, I&#039;ll need help writing actual code for validation, so this could prove very useful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, let&#8217;s talk in some detail.  I have an interface in my Verbosio application for validating XML documents in a given language such as XUL.  Soon, I&#8217;ll need help writing actual code for validation, so this could prove very useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Finkle</title>
		<link>http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2007/01/thinking-about-a-xul-validator/comment-page-1/#comment-428</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Finkle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 23:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2007/01/thinking-about-a-xul-validator/#comment-428</guid>
		<description>Axel-

Thanks, I totally missed localization and skinning. Updating...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Axel-</p>
<p>Thanks, I totally missed localization and skinning. Updating&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Axel Hecht</title>
		<link>http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2007/01/thinking-about-a-xul-validator/comment-page-1/#comment-427</link>
		<dc:creator>Axel Hecht</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 23:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2007/01/thinking-about-a-xul-validator/#comment-427</guid>
		<description>There is a whole slew of things to make your XUL localizable right, too. http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Writing_localizable_code has at least some, I just saw that it misses out on the golden rule to name label entities .label and accesskeys .accesskey together with the same prefix. The translate toolkit needs that. Then there&#039;s the talk that dynamis gave at the summit, mentioning issues like &quot;don&#039;t concat different strings with spaces&quot; or &quot;don&#039;t put a plaintext &#039;.&#039; in your xul&quot;.

Another big point would be RTL, when designing a XUL interface, you want to take good care that your stuff works if you change layout to RTL. Not sure what that means in concrete guidelines, though, and if a tool could check that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a whole slew of things to make your XUL localizable right, too. <a href="http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Writing_localizable_code" rel="nofollow">http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Writing_localizable_code</a> has at least some, I just saw that it misses out on the golden rule to name label entities .label and accesskeys .accesskey together with the same prefix. The translate toolkit needs that. Then there&#8217;s the talk that dynamis gave at the summit, mentioning issues like &#8220;don&#8217;t concat different strings with spaces&#8221; or &#8220;don&#8217;t put a plaintext &#8216;.&#8217; in your xul&#8221;.</p>
<p>Another big point would be RTL, when designing a XUL interface, you want to take good care that your stuff works if you change layout to RTL. Not sure what that means in concrete guidelines, though, and if a tool could check that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2007/01/thinking-about-a-xul-validator/comment-page-1/#comment-425</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 21:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2007/01/thinking-about-a-xul-validator/#comment-425</guid>
		<description>Maybe you could use the name &quot;lint&quot; for it? I think it would be a great tool. I haven&#039;t started to tackle XUL but I&#039;ve been watching your blog because it&#039;s a great resource for when I finally get around tuit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe you could use the name &#8220;lint&#8221; for it? I think it would be a great tool. I haven&#8217;t started to tackle XUL but I&#8217;ve been watching your blog because it&#8217;s a great resource for when I finally get around tuit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

