Comments on: FUEL Project Status http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2007/02/fuel-project-status/ Sun, 29 Apr 2012 07:09:30 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Brendan Eich http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2007/02/fuel-project-status/comment-page-1/#comment-725 Brendan Eich Sat, 10 Feb 2007 01:12:09 +0000 http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2007/02/fuel-project-status/#comment-725 I don't think FUEL should go in toolkit -- yet. Let it serve one master well, not be a house divided (or pretend to serve many masters, which can be even more frustrating). I agree with Dao. As JS perpetrator, it's always driven me crazy when people mix up event and handler or listener. "onclick" is a handler, not an "event" -- "click" is the event name. /be I don’t think FUEL should go in toolkit — yet. Let it serve one master well, not be a house divided (or pretend to serve many masters, which can be even more frustrating).

I agree with Dao. As JS perpetrator, it’s always driven me crazy when people mix up event and handler or listener. “onclick” is a handler, not an “event” — “click” is the event name.

/be

]]> By: Brian King http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2007/02/fuel-project-status/comment-page-1/#comment-721 Brian King Fri, 09 Feb 2007 09:48:10 +0000 http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2007/02/fuel-project-status/#comment-721 Great, can't wait to get my grubby hands on it! Great, can’t wait to get my grubby hands on it!

]]> By: Dao http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2007/02/fuel-project-status/comment-page-1/#comment-703 Dao Thu, 08 Feb 2007 00:38:13 +0000 http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2007/02/fuel-project-status/#comment-703 ... that is, please make FUEL implement the <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-2-Events/events.html#Events-EventTarget" rel="nofollow">EventTarget</a> interface. … that is, please make FUEL implement the EventTarget interface.

]]> By: Dao http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2007/02/fuel-project-status/comment-page-1/#comment-702 Dao Thu, 08 Feb 2007 00:31:52 +0000 http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2007/02/fuel-project-status/#comment-702 Please change the API to use addEventListener instead of addEvent. The latter is inconsistent and doesn't make sense. Please change the API to use addEventListener instead of addEvent. The latter is inconsistent and doesn’t make sense.

]]> By: Laurentj http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2007/02/fuel-project-status/comment-page-1/#comment-697 Laurentj Wed, 07 Feb 2007 20:52:46 +0000 http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2007/02/fuel-project-status/#comment-697 uh ? browser/fuel ?? Why not in the toolkit directory ?? All of the API of 0.1 version could be VERY usefull for any application ! I want this into xulrunner ! :-) Please split your api in two directories . For example : - application, events, extensions, preferences, file I/O, storage, applicationstorage into toolkit/ content/fuel/ - sessionstorage, browser, bookmarks, into browser/fuel ( or why not browser/base/content/fuel ) Thanks :-) uh ? browser/fuel ?? Why not in the toolkit directory ?? All of the API of 0.1 version could be VERY usefull for any application ! I want this into xulrunner ! :-)

Please split your api in two directories . For example :

- application, events, extensions, preferences, file I/O, storage, applicationstorage into toolkit/ content/fuel/
- sessionstorage, browser, bookmarks, into browser/fuel ( or why not browser/base/content/fuel )

Thanks :-)

]]>