<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Inner Beauty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2007/05/inner-beauty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2007/05/inner-beauty/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 15:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Leslie W</title>
		<link>http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2007/05/inner-beauty/#comment-2234</link>
		<dc:creator>Leslie W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 00:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2007/05/inner-beauty/#comment-2234</guid>
		<description>Check out some MozPad mtg transcripts:

http://www.mozpad.org/doku.php?id=transcript_snippets</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out some MozPad mtg transcripts:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mozpad.org/doku.php?id=transcript_snippets" rel="nofollow">http://www.mozpad.org/doku.php?id=transcript_snippets</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fwenzel</title>
		<link>http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2007/05/inner-beauty/#comment-2227</link>
		<dc:creator>fwenzel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 09:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2007/05/inner-beauty/#comment-2227</guid>
		<description>Hm. I wouldn't call Zimbra sexy -- it works well when it works but it's a heavy javascript monster that makes Firefox considerably slower at times. Sometimes I wish they had gone a little bit easier on the JS side.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm. I wouldn&#8217;t call Zimbra sexy &#8212; it works well when it works but it&#8217;s a heavy javascript monster that makes Firefox considerably slower at times. Sometimes I wish they had gone a little bit easier on the JS side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Stewart</title>
		<link>http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2007/05/inner-beauty/#comment-2226</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 19:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2007/05/inner-beauty/#comment-2226</guid>
		<description>I love all the examples you gave Mark, sIFR, Google Finance and dojo Storage. I think those are awesome Flash applications because they blend two (or more) worlds so well and really leverage Flash at some of its strong points.

By "sexy" I really meant desktop-looking applications. Gmail is great, but no one would confuse it for a desktop application any time soon. Are all desktop applications usable? No way. But the ones that combine rich and usability are always good.

Thanks for the feedback Mark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love all the examples you gave Mark, sIFR, Google Finance and dojo Storage. I think those are awesome Flash applications because they blend two (or more) worlds so well and really leverage Flash at some of its strong points.</p>
<p>By &#8220;sexy&#8221; I really meant desktop-looking applications. Gmail is great, but no one would confuse it for a desktop application any time soon. Are all desktop applications usable? No way. But the ones that combine rich and usability are always good.</p>
<p>Thanks for the feedback Mark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2007/05/inner-beauty/#comment-2225</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 18:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2007/05/inner-beauty/#comment-2225</guid>
		<description>I'm with you, Mark. Flash apps may as well be standalone executable files, they don't leverage much in the browser and they don't follow any browser standards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with you, Mark. Flash apps may as well be standalone executable files, they don&#8217;t leverage much in the browser and they don&#8217;t follow any browser standards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: enefekt</title>
		<link>http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2007/05/inner-beauty/#comment-2224</link>
		<dc:creator>enefekt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 13:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2007/05/inner-beauty/#comment-2224</guid>
		<description>So this kind of Flash doesn't impress you?

http://www.virtub.com/

Same codebase, desktop and browser, cross-os support.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So this kind of Flash doesn&#8217;t impress you?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.virtub.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.virtub.com/</a></p>
<p>Same codebase, desktop and browser, cross-os support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
