<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bubblemark is an RIA Benchmark?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2008/04/bubblemark-is-an-ria-benchmark/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2008/04/bubblemark-is-an-ria-benchmark/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 05:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Stewart</title>
		<link>http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2008/04/bubblemark-is-an-ria-benchmark/#comment-5909</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 09:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2008/04/buublemark/#comment-5909</guid>
		<description>The test has lots of issues, no doubt about it, but there's a huge lack of independant benchmarks across all of the different technologies. Putting faith in any one benchmark is very, very silly but if you want a general idea, BubbleMark is the only place to go for now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The test has lots of issues, no doubt about it, but there&#8217;s a huge lack of independant benchmarks across all of the different technologies. Putting faith in any one benchmark is very, very silly but if you want a general idea, BubbleMark is the only place to go for now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
